Johnnych01 Regular
That looks pretty nice. Not heard of them before though. Are their kits any good ?
2 replies
That looks pretty nice. Not heard of them before though. Are their kits any good ?
2 replies
They are a new company, first kit was the Iron Dome:
And have announced an F4U Corsair to be released soon:
I will definitely be getting one of these. From what I’ve seen, heard, and read, Magic Factory kits are pretty damn good. Here’s a blog on the Iron Dome kit on Track-Link TRACK-LINK / Forums / Track-Link Build Logs / Air Defense System Iron Dome by Magic Factory
Magic Factory’s accuracy is high so far. This Bradley kit really appeals.
Just read through the link. They do look nice and well detailed, well, the Iron Dome once does …
This could be the one I get as the AD version looks like a good one to do. I was considering getting the Kinetic A3…
Awesome announcement. This looks great. Can’t wait to get one. Too bad no interior, but the Meng interior should fit in it.
Not on the ‘must have’ to add to the stash that will never get built…but sure looks like a well-engineered kit!
One point to note. The Bradley M-SHORAD has not been accepted by the US Army. It is only a test/experimental platform being offered by BAE. So far, the accepted M-SHORAD system is the Stryker M-SHORAD vehicle. It uses most of the same equipment as the Bradley system, but is not exactly the same.
The Bradley M-SHORAD kit is really groundbreaking. I am surprised that it was released so soon due to the lack of references and exposure at AUSA Expo.
With the Magic Factory’s 1/35 Bradley M-SHORAD, an AFV modeler can salvage the parts for pickups, MRZR dune buggies, JLTV C-UAS, and other “What If?” scenario Air Defense units. You can place the AUDS mast on shipping containers, HEMTTS, MTVR, FMTVs, ATV, trailer, tripod, buildings, and what have you for future hypothetical Air Defense or ATGM units.
For example, Magic Factory’s Bradley M-SHORAD has these awesome precious 1/35 Air Defense parts:
Hmmm. I was working on pMHR radar CAD for fun (maybe a bit sadistic) but I guess I can stop now. 
Keep on going…
And for the twin Hellfire launcher option…can be used for all sorts of fictitious settings. The same goes for the Stinger 4-shot launcher box.
No, not yet.
There are related kits in the pipeline that will make you drool. And you know when I say it;s coming, it’s coming. Took a haiatus from doing a lot of kit research for a few years, but now I’m back at it.
I wonder about the accuracy of the mount for the Stinger launch box. Did the Army change the already existing design? It sure doesn’t match the photos I took for my Linebacker build a few years ago. But then, neither does the 3D printed version that’s available. That one is about 20% correct.
2 replies
The mount on the kit looks to be the same as on the BAE prototype. I would assume that they would go with a similar armored box and mount design if it goes into production.
Our tax dollars at work! So the army did indeed take an existing design that worked fine and pay hundreds of thousands of dollars in R&D so that they could come up with a different mount that does exactly the same thing. Sounds about right.
Well, after closer examination, I think that new mount does indeed serve a different purpose. The Stinger launcher box appears to have rails that slide onto corresponding rails on the new mount, It looks to be either a quick reload system for a new box, or even a diferrent ordnance package altogether. I’b betting on the latter.
Thats what was said about the 1/35 M992. I think if it ever comes to be I will be too old to build or dead…
HobbyEasy lists its release as December 10, 2023 for $38.88 USD. Preorder is available now.
https://www.hobbyeasy.com/en/data/noyzvwcglbdv6rsbgecb.html?t=1699892589
Thanks for that
Saw something interesting in the pics on eBay for the new Magic Factory M2A4 Brad. In the camo w/ERA pic, the rear light guard is the extended style seen on the BFIST, with an antenna mounted on top of it. Hmm…
