1:1 Scale US Army WWII Infantry Battalion Radio Collection

Something a little different - one of my other hobbies is collecting militaria. Over the past few years, I’ve really been interested in the development and fielding of radio technology as a way to better understand how the US military was preparing for and what its readiness state was for the war.

Turns out there are many false and misleading “urban legends” and myths surrounding the general topic, and the advanced state of the US Army’s Signal Corps Laboratory’s designs and development (which included very close association with the electronics industry before and during the war) emphasizes the myth of the general and longstanding belief of unpreparedness.

From left to right: SCR-284 battalion “base station” radio; the SCR-610 artillery / forward observer set and remote control device; the SCR-300 “Walkie Talkie” battalion and company set; the SCR-536 “Handy Talkie” company and platoon set; on the corner, the SCR-511 “Pogo Stick” set designed for the horse cavalry but fielded and used by the infantry battalion and company in North Africa, Italy and early years in the Pacific; and in the center background, the SCR-195 ORIGINAL “Walkie Talkie” infantry battalion and company set, fielded in 1936 at the basis of issue of 36 sets per infantry regiment.

From right to left: the SCR-195 original “Walkie Talkie” first fielded in 1936 after initial prototyping and tests which started in 1932 and used through ca. 1943 by some infantry divisions; on the corner, another view of the SCR-511 “Pogo Stick” set also used through 1943 by some infantry divisions; followed by the more familiar SCR-536 “Handy Talkie”, the second generation “Walkie Talkie” SCR-300; the artillery SCR-610 with remote control device; and on the floor in the background, the battalion “base station” SCR-284 with hand cranked G-43 generator.

Keep in mind that these are just the radios used in the Infantry Battalion, Company and Platoon. The basis of issue meant that it was common for even single infantry squads to have push-to-talk radio coms with their platoon and company command. Every infantry company commander had push-to-talk coms with his battalion and battalion support assets (battalion trains for logistics and battalion mortars and the battalion med). Every battalion had both Morse Code and voice radio coms with its parent regiment or brigade and in a pinch with its division. This doesn’t include landline phone coms throughout the battalion using the EE-8 field phone and the battalion’s switch board.

With the exception of the battalion signals platoon using its organic SCR-284, none of the other radio sets required specialist, school-trained radio operators. All of the other sets could be operated by anyone with just the briefest of familiarization. Every infantryman could be a radio operator for his tactical unit. This greatly reduced the problems for training and manning infantry units. Radio “operator” casualties were simply replaced with another infantryman from the same unit. The large numbers of radio sets meant that most damaged or lost sets were quickly replaced from a pool of extra sets held at the next higher level of support.

ALL of these radio sets, with the exception of the SCR-284, employed crystal frequency controls and were literally, push-to-talk. No intermittent tuning was necessary (as environmental or use changed the internal mechanical tuning element characteristics resulting in frequency “drift” over the course of operations), nor was it necessary to conduct the daily (sometimes more often) “netting” procedures common with other armies necessary in order to get all of the stations precisely tuned / re-tuned with each other before the start of or during combat operations.

6 Likes

Very impressive. It would be interesting to compare the same equipment available to other armies at the time.

3 Likes

I knew from the title you were the one posting this. Thanks for posting. (And your 'interview" last semester helped)

2 Likes

It would indeed. Unfortunately, it’s difficult enough to research the US Signal Corps development, design and fielding of this equipment without trying to do the same with the other major combatants at the time.

There is an official, 3-volume US Army Signal Corps history that is readily available. However, even it glosses over most of the detail surrounding any specific radio set (except when that detail is used to illustrate some other larger point being made). None of the still existing manufacturers offer any help or assistance to the researcher, and, frankly, none of their published history covering the period of the war is of much help at all. (One suspects that most of their historical records going back that far have been lost or destroyed, anyway.)

There are a couple of references for German radio equipment, but they have had very limited publication and are very (VERY!) expensive if you can even find copies (and I have none of them). My reading of the few reviews of those books does not give me the impression that they give much detailed information about the historical development, technical designs and manufacturing.

The most comprehensive work on the British / Commonwealth wartime radios is “Wireless for the Warrior.” I have looked at a number of those, and while they do cover the many and various individual sets fielded, the amount of information on any given set is quite limited. It’s a good series for identifying the sets and accessories, but - at least from what I’ve seen - not so good for the history and detailed technical development.

I imagine that there must be something published on the Japanese tactical radios used during the war, but if there is, I don’t know any details about it. I would suspect that if such exists, it’s probably in Japanese, so the language barrier would be a problem (if you could even find copies). It also doesn’t appear that the Japanese fielded many radios at the lower tactical levels with the infantry.

Soviet fielding tactical radios at the infantry battalion and lower levels also appears to have been very limited. Again, if the information and details exist, the same problems also exist as with the Japanese sets in accessing that information.

Having said all of the above, though, there are clues and details to be found that suggest very strongly that the US Army had major advantages over all of the other combatants when it came to radio communications at the lowest ground tactical levels. These primarily stem from decisions made before the war to employ FM for almost all voice communications; to use crystal frequency controls; and to design and field sets that did not require specialist trained radio operators.

I have drafted up a number of detailed research monographs on some of the radios used in the US infantry battalion - the SCR-300, the SCR-194 / 195, and the SCR-511. I’m presently working on one for the SCR-284 and have plans to also cover the SCR-536 and the SCR-610 (technically an artillery set but used by forward observers directly supporting the infantry). So far, I’ve written these as stand-alone works, but what is becoming clearer as I make progress is that they all should be combined into a single work. There is an evolutionary process in their development and fielding that applies to them collectively.

One technical aspect that I have learned, and which is almost never mentioned anywhere involves the decision and then use of crystal frequency control in US radio sets. This was managed under production priorities and funding that rivaled the Manhattan Project and which none of the other combatants ever came anywhere close to rivaling. (For example, single month US production of frequency control crystals outpaced the entirety of the German wartime production of the same, and this US production rate was kept up month, after month, after month for years.) Crystal frequency control enables literally push-button frequency (channel) switching without any other need for tuning and the frequencies remain stable and unchanging under all environmental and operational conditions (as long as the quality of the raw crystal is high and production standards are kept stringent - both of which the US industry excelled at). Technical research and intelligence exploitation by the British during the war discovered that German crystals (such as were produced) had high amounts of impurities which caused unstable frequency shifts when subjected to changes in temperature (think North Africa in the afternoon or Russia in the winter as night sets).

At any rate, I find the subject very interesting and enlightening.

2 Likes

I imagine that budgets have alot to do what a military puts into this technology and also what is available in the civilian market? How many generals are fighting the last war and just plan on using runners as they did when they were LTs or CPTs?

I think another interesting radio related topic is the evolution of the tank/infantry communications mounted outside of Tanks in WWII.

2 Likes

You may find the history of MacNair Barracks in Berlin interesting. It was the industrial complex for Telefunken.

2 Likes

@Dan Both are interesting observations, and the answers to both might not be what you would expect (at least with reference to the US Army in the interwar and war periods).

The US Army Signal Corps was actually one of the world leading research and development entities in the interwar period. Its Signal Corps Laboratory got its start during WWI in Paris, when a unit was stood up to gather and consolidate any and all “wireless” technology available from any of the combatants. Interwar US Signal Corps officer / scientist-engineers patented a number of cutting-edge radio developments (including Master Oscillator and Master Oscillator Power Amplifier, MOPA, frequency controls, and Heterodyne and Super-Heterodyne tuning).

Of course, the US was not alone in military research for radio coms, but counter to the myths and legends about US unpreparedness or backwardness during the interwar period, the US was not sitting on its hands. Like almost every other nation, military spending budgets were thin, but the US did, in fact, develop and field a number of military radios for aircraft, tanks and infantry in the 1920s. The SCR-194 / 195 - the original “Walkie Talkie” backpack radio set prototyping began as early as 1932 with the design accepted for production by 1935 and funding for production and fielding starting in 1936. This set was fielded at an issue basis of 32 sets per infantry regiment (and nearly the same number per artillery regiment).

The infantry version (SCR-195) was a 16-pound, AM voice set with 32 channels, a 5-mile range and a battery life of about 16 hours. It featured integral crystal frequency tuning that could be used by the operator with no need for external technical / maintenance support. It was issued to all of the companies, battalions and regimental HQ and could, literally be used while the operator carried it on his back (hence the nickname, “Walkie Talkie”). It could be used by any infantryman (or cannoneer) with no particular specialist training. These sets proved the utility to both the infantry and the artillery branches of integrated, widespread voice radio coms, and in the large-scale maneuvers of the late ‘30s and early ‘40s the doctrines to effectively use and exploit those coms were developed.

Consider now - Here we have the US Army infantry issued with a backpack, voice radio set, 5-mile range down to the company level five years before the US entered the war (and three years before the war started in Europe). At the same time, the US Army tank corps and mechanized cavalry were requesting FM voice radio sets for their tanks / combat cars based on the same technology that was already being used in commercial and public motorized applications.

The issue of tank / infantry coms is more related to the technical issues of radio frequency management that combined with technical issues around developing radios. The technology actually developed faster than was realized and appreciated. Early mechanical master oscillator frequency tuning did not allow the spectrum to divided up as finely as actually became possible before the war ended. Thus, each branch was allocated its own part of the spectrum which was broad enough for that branch to divide it up into the minimum number of “channels” it required, each channel separated from the others by more of that spectrum than was eventually needed. A result of this was the development of separate radio systems for each branch that operated on that branch’s own portion of the bandwidth with little to no overlap in (shared) frequencies with the other branches.

As the war progressed, better equipment was designed that could “squeeze” more channels out of the same amount of bandwidth, but the die was already cast. Specifically, with the armor - infantry issue, by the autumn of 1944, a system was developed and started to be fielded which installed the infantry SCR-300 into the Sherman tank. (Or course, the problem had long been recognized, hence the MWO’s that authorized and directed the mounting of external telephones for the infantry wired into the tank’s intercom system.) So, not a complete answer nor completely integrated and fielded, but during the last year of the war, the US Army did have the capability for infantry-tank radio coms.

The technology advances largely answer the question of why so much of the US Army’s radio equipment was almost immediately designated limited standard or obsolete as soon as the war ended. The Army was ready with new radio designs and fielding plans that were held up in order to prevent confusion and disruptions since the sets already in use were getting the job done.

4 Likes