I know this goes without saying but I am not suggesting that anyone’s CHU is incorrect. I am just pleased that the question of the CHU is being addressed at all!
In the early designs for the CHU I don’t think the whole flip-over to storage idea had been perfected yet. So the retaining and guide structures centered around that massive arched lifting point on the CHU have changed considerably since the early versions. (Admittedly I am making a lot of assumptions here.)
Here is yet another intermediate design attempt for the lighter weight. simplified CHU that carries the designation E-PLS.
