AFV Club Sd.Kfz. 11

Armor/AFV WWII Axis
1

Well this is my first attempt at building for a number of years, due to medical. I was wondering if there are pitfalls with the kit? Just wondering. Thanks as always

4 Likes
2

Is it the basic version? I built the /4 variant but other than the cargo arrangement they should be the same I think.

1 Like
3

Reported issues (based on community builds)

1) Tricky fit in the rear compartment

There are reports of interference between the inner side panels and the rear seats:

  • Rear seats can be slightly too wide for the available space
  • Some builders had to sand, thin down, or even trim parts to make them fit (KitMaker forums)

Practical tip:

  • Dry-fit is essential before painting the interior
  • It may help to partially assemble the hull first and then adapt the seats to the available space

2) Slightly oversized rear panels

A recurring comment:

  • Some panels (especially in the rear area) appear to be slightly oversized (KitMaker forums)

Effect:

  • Can create gaps or stress in the assembly
  • May push the structure out of alignment

Typical fix:

  • Sand inner edges as needed
  • Test-fit using tape before committing to glue

3) Front suspension alignment issues

Specific reports mention the following:

  • Suspension mounting points don’t always line up well with the locating holes (KitMaker forums)
  • Even enlarging the holes doesn’t always fully solve the issue

Risk:

  • Incorrect geometry affecting wheel alignment and track fit

Experienced builder tip:

  • Dry-fit everything and use a flat surface or jig to ensure proper alignment

4) Sprocket and tracks assembly challenges

Reported issues include:

  • Difficulty closing the sprocket correctly
  • Needing to force-fit parts to accommodate the tracks (KitMaker forums)

Implication:

  • Can compromise track tension and final look

Recommended approach:

  • Test-fit sprocket and tracks together before final assembly
  • Adjust diameter slightly with careful sanding if needed

5) Typical AFV Club engineering traits

General observations across builds:

  • Instructions can be unclear
  • Limited locating pins
  • Constant need for:
    • Dry-fitting
    • Cleaning up contact points
  • Thin parts and tight tolerances

In short:

This is not a “shake & bake” kit like Tamiya — it requires a more hands-on approach (KitMaker forums)

6) Sensitivity to build sequence

Important note from builders:

  • Small mistakes early on can snowball later in the build (KitMaker forums)

Typical scenario in this kit:

  • If chassis or suspension alignment is slightly off:
    • The hull may not close properly
    • Tracks won’t sit correctly

Overall community assessment

Cons:

  • Tricky fit in rear compartment
  • Slightly oversized rear panels
  • Front suspension alignment issues
  • Sprocket and track assembly can be challenging
  • Unclear instructions and limited locating aids
  • High sensitivity to build sequence

Pros:

  • Good level of detail for its age
  • Accurate overall shape and proportions
  • Realistic individual-link tracks
  • Versatile subject for dioramas and conversions
  • Excellent final result if handled carefully

Honest summary:

A ‘modeller’s kit’ — rewarding if you take your time, but unforgiving if rushed.

4 Likes
4

Really useful summary of possible issues as well as the pros and cons of the kit! Thanks!

2 Likes
5

I had swapped the positive and negative points.

1 Like
6

Yep, I’m looking at my one in the display case as I type this. I remember really struggling with the back part. But when done it looks OK. I don’t think they could have done a test build before releasing it.

3 Likes
7

Good to hear you’re getting back into the hobby after issues. Not sure your experience before hand but a AFV Club would not be the recommendation for knocking the dust off. Either way post your progress.

1 Like
8

Thanks for the input. I think I’ll go with the Dragon version, besides I haven’t had much luck with AFV Club

1 Like
9

Do Dragon do one? I don’t remember it. They do an Sdkfz10, with and without gun to tow, or with and without crew, which is totally different vehicle, the 10 is the 1 tonne vehicle (basis of the Sdkfz250), the 11 is the 3 tonner (basis for the Sdkfz251). The Sdkfz 10 was subsequently upgraded so it could tow the Pak40 and the LFh 18/40, which both weighed 1.5 tonnes IIRC, which removed the need for the larger vehicle.

2 Likes