Big Bruiser, Average Punch: I ❤ Kit M53 155mm Self-Propelled Gun

I’m still catching up on posting builds from this year.

Through the Korean War, all self-propelled artillery featured open top fighting compartments. As the US Army contemplated fighting and winning on a nuclear battlefield, they realized that open-top half-tracks and artillery were not survivable. The M53 and M55 were designed for that nuclear battlefield with a fully enclosed turret. It leveraged the automotives from the M46 and M47 tanks. Pacific Car and Foundry began producing the M53 in late 1952. However, testing revealed many problems that required rework in 1955. The US Marines fielded the M53 and used it early in the Vietnam War. However, the US Army does not appear to have fielded it and converted all of its M53’s to 8-inch M55’s in 1956 by swapping the barrels and ammunition racks. In the end, the Army viewed the M53 as too big and heavy for its caliber.

Until recently, anyone wanting an M53 in 1:35 either had to deal with the old challenging Elite Models resin kit; or convert the even older Renwal 1:32 scale M55. The 2023 I :heart:Kit M53 delivers a decent model with much less work. Upon opening the box and examining the parts, a couple of issues immediately presented themselves: On an artillery piece the eye is drawn to the barrel. Unfortunately, the kit barrel is far too large in diameter, it measures out to be an 8-inch bore vs. 155mm, and it is 13mm too short. The canvas mantel cover is molded in vinyl and is lacking the many folds shown in pictures. And rather unbelievingly, 4 of the roadwheels are lacking the molded in hubs… Fortunately, a corrected barrel and roadwheels were CADed and 3D printed for me by James Lee (@Petition2God).


I played with sculpting a replacement mantlet cover with Milliput but decided my sculpting skills were no better than ILoveKit’s. This is an opportunity for anyone who is good at sculpting… In the end I built the model without the canvas cover. The kit comes with individual link tracks; but I was not satisfied with the detail and the mold seam on the end connectors; so, opted for AFV Club T84E1 Track for M26 Pershing and M46 Patton.

Other than the above issues, the kit is not bad. The detail is acceptable. The fit is good. There were a couple of ejector pin marks that had to addressed. The kit includes PE for the exhaust grills, mudflaps, etc. The decals only depict US Marine vehicles.

I ended up with a fairly long list of improvements / additions to the kit:
• Replaced barrel and road wheels with 3D printed corrected versions
• Replaced kit tracks with AFV Club individual link tracks
• Scratched the travel lock to fit the corrected barrel
• Added weld beads to the turret top and spade
• Textured the mantlet with Mr. Surfacer 500 and added foundry marks
• Replaced kit gas cans with PE water can holders and resin water cans
• Added towing shackles from the spares box
• Fitted a tow cable from Eureka XXL
• Filled all of the pioneer/OVM tool mounting holes with stretch sprue.
• Replaced kit tool rack with PE from the spares box
• Replaced kit pioneer tools with resin aftermarket ones
• Added pioneer tool / OVM retaining straps from lead strips with PE buckles and PE footman loops
• Added 3D printed track jacks to the front of the turret
• Added DR-8 commo wire spool from PE spares and fine copper wire
• Scratch built the pully system/locking mechanism for raising and lowering the spade
• Soldered brass rod to the PE equipment stowage racks vs the kit styrene rods
• Designed custom decals and had them printed




As I could find no evidence of this weapon being issued to US Army artillery units, I opted to finish it as one of the Army test and evaluation units. I primed it with Mr. Surfacer 1500 black from a rattle can. I preshaded with Tamiya XF-2 White. The base paint job started with a light coat of Tamiya XF-62 Olive Drab allowing the black and white to show through. I then switched to a lightened mix of 3 parts XF-62 OD and 1 part SF-60 Dark Yellow for the centers of the panels. I highlighted with 50-50 XF-62 and XF-60. I applied a dot filter of various Winsor & Newton oil paints.

After applying my custom decals, I sealed them in with VMS Satin Varnish. That stuff is great for making the decals disappear into the paint. As I am depicting a test and eval unit, it was only very lightly weathered.




This kit was a lot more work than I envisioned - 117 hours. But I am happy with the results, and it looks great in the display case. Although I am representing a test and eval unit, I wonder if I should weather it a bit more. What do you guys think?

Rick

29 Likes

It’s a freaking masterpiece, Rick!

4 Likes

Sharp looking beast!

3 Likes

Looks awesome. :+1:

Did you have to do any of the hull modifications you did on the M55?

3 Likes

Looks awesome. Great job.

3 Likes

Outstanding write-up and equally outstanding build. :+1:t3:

3 Likes

So ugly it’s beautiful… great job

3 Likes

Somewhat applicable to your model I made a Takom T30 as one of the APG vehicles. Limited weathering is appropriate for a vehicle outside of the cross-country course.


I made my dust cover from siliconized wrapping tissue. I laid paper over the turret and sketched out what the pieces would look like, drew them up in CAD, and used them to cut pieces out of the tissue. I laid them on the model and mated the seams with glue. A soaking with diluted white glue allowed forming folds and drapes. It was then part of the model and painted and such. Too late for this one, but maybe you can try it later.



KL

7 Likes

@Tank_1812 I haven’t built my M55 8-Inch version yet. I looked at the height issue. It is a bit tall; but it is not obvious. Cutting down the hull by a couple of mm and lowering the return rollers is a lot of work. It just didn’t seem to be worth the effort to correct something that is hardly perceptible.

3 Likes

I haven’t built my M55 8-Inch version yet. I looked at the height issue. It is a bit tall; but it is not obvious. Cutting down the hull by a couple of mm and lowering the return rollers is a lot of work. It just didn’t seem to be worth the effort to correct something that is hardly perceptible.

I was going to ask about that. Are you saying the M53 and M55 hulls are different?

KL

4 Likes

Kurt, the hulls are the same on the M55 and M53. The kit sits a bit tall. You only notice it when you put a figure next to it and you know that the engine deck is about head tall. It just wasn’t worth it to me to spend the time cutting down the hull and lowering the return rollers. The T162 prototypes with the 175mm gun did have a slightly longer (8 inches) and wider (2 inches) hull. I’ve toyed with the idea of doing a conversion for that; but it is low on my priority list. However, I’ve seen the prototype at Ft Sill and that impossibly long gun is pretty impressive…

3 Likes

Outstanding job Rick. Great build and the finish is excellent. Looks awesome!

2 Likes

Very nice job Kurt!

2 Likes

Kurt, thanks for the ideas on the mantlet cover. That is much of my delay on starting the M55. I’ll have to experiment some more… Thanks again!

1 Like

Then let me expand a little: The “siliconized wrapping tissue” is tissue taped to an open frame about 6 inches square. It is coated with a diluted solution of siliconized acrylic caulk, this being one example. Brush it on both sides, carefully, because the wet tissue will tear. Let it dry and repeat, totaling 3 or 4 coats.

This will give a material that is more durable than plain tissue when wet, more flexible than white glue coated tissue, and still able to take paint without beading. It has a smooth finish unlike raw tissue that often looks like exactly what it is. In my eye it looks and behaves much like rubberized canvas would if shrunken down. Many times sculpted putty looks like draped silk rather than the creased and wrinked canvas it should be.


KL

7 Likes

Rick, that’s a very useful check-list (I have the M55) so thanks for posting. Outstanding model too!

2 Likes

Thank you Kurt! I’ll round up the materials and give that technique a try.

1 Like