F-4J VMFA-333 USS America 1972, Tamiya 1/32

I dont like the F-4 as an aircraft, it is as if the engineers are pointing their middle finger to aerodynamics and saying “in thrust we trust” followed by a load of geometry slurs…

As a modelling subject though it is perfect. Lots of details, paint schemes, weapons loadouts, versions, rivets, metal surfaces etc etc.

The base kit is the well known Tamiya kit plus the following extras:
Aires cockpit and ejection seats, resin intakes, QMT R32002E exhausts and arresting hook, Master 32043 pitot and angle of attack sensor, Eduard 32509 placards, Eduard wheels, masks, photoetch for the exterior and interior, Quickboost vertical tail inlet, QMT auxhiliary air intake details and panels, Eduard AIM-9D plus I will try to use the Procal extensive stencil set for an F-4E wherever possible using the Navair manual.

As my main reference source I am using the DACO book on the Navy Phantoms.

Work started with preparing the resin cockpit tub. Lots of sanding and dry fitting required, not the most pleasant experience. If you add the cost of the Aires set I would say I will only do it once more for the second F-4J because I already bought the cockpit set and never again. 3D decals should be a better option.

I also added the resin intakes to the fuselage (something I will regret later…)

These are the QMT auxhiliary air intakes, the specific set is out of production now. I used the set for the Revell kit because of the improved detail on the doors.

Panel line work and corrections

Cockpit tub

Intakes painted and fuselage assembled

I tried to detail the wheel bays a bit

I also added the centerline fuel tank braces

Fuselage has been primed, some puttywork required

I made a jig to hold the model in place while I am scribing the panel lines and riveting

Master pitot added

The model is primed after riveting and panel line scribbing.

The loadout will be 4 AIM7, 4 AIM9D, centerline fuel tank and 4 TER with Mk82 long fuse bombs. Detail work on the pylons and armament:

And here is a dry fit of the armament

While fitting the front Sparrows into their wells I noticed that they did not fit and their front wings bumped onto the air intake ramps for some reason. After measuring and checking the alignment of the intakes I discovered that they were 2mm shorter at the fuselage and misaligned vertically.

I decided to realign the whole model so I cut it

I used epoxy glue to install a shaft to keep the wings in the correct shape and reinforced the fuselage into position

Reinforcing the wings and fuselage so as to get the correct shape and angle will be my go to method from now on.

The intaked were installed at the correct position and the resulting gap was filled with Milliput

Of course I had to rescibe the lines and rivets.

Armament:

Centerline fuel tank and sparrows

Pylons

Next is painting the fuselage.

9 Likes

Wow what a great blog sofar, so much work into this allready, I will keep following this… :+1::+1::+1:

1 Like

Stunning work Nikos, it looks brilliant and great recovery with the misaligned area … looks great after the cutting and refixing together.

1 Like

Yup… stunning…

1 Like

Whoa, awesome work on this big dog !!!

1 Like

Wow, that’s a fast pace build. You on a roll buddy!

1 Like

I’m curious, will it actually fly carrying all that weaponry and if so so what would it’s range be?

1 Like

The only discrepancy on the loadout are the two front sparrows, not because of weight but because in order to fire them the pilot had to jettison the centerline fuel tank because the wings of the missiles would bump on the tank. Vietnam war phantoms used this loadout.

2 Likes

They can carry a lot.

AOAdecals - 1/48 Decals

Towards the bottom has a load out chart for each squadron.

I can’t remember which of our aircraft I was asking about at the museum, the A-7 or the F-4 (maybe both) but one of the docents who was a pilot told me eighteen 500 lb. bombs - externally. It seemed so unlikely with those smallish wings, but he would know.

The F-4 can carry 15 and the A-7 more.

At least that is what the text says but the photos suggest otherwise. A TER can hold 6 -500 lb bombs. Would need to do more research.

1 Like

I’ll ask hm again on Tuesday. I’m almost sure it was the F4. I do know for certain the number eighteen came up. Here’s my thought: IF, and I mean IF, there were eighteen hardpoints, I can see a pilot tsaking off with less fuel to allow for the extra ordnance and a quick jaunt to Hanoi. How many times on this forum has someone spouted the by the book solution, only to be shown what soldiers really do? Some of these Air Force cats are the same way. I’ll ask around. I’ve got to replace a transmission on one of the tugs on Tuesday.

3 Likes

For a carrier based F-4 there is the catapult pull weight restriction that is way lower than the plane’s lifting capability. The heaviest would have been something like the one in the photo:

For land based aircraft like in Da Nang you could see heavier loadouts (F-4B in the photo)

usually close in support aircraft carried 2 AIM 9 and maybe the 2 rear AIM7.

And this is a photo from a test (no missiles at all)

So regarding my loadout choise, it is way too much for a carrier based F-4 and it is higly unlikely for a land based F-4.

2 Likes

Theoretically, the plane can drop a maximum of 24 munitions:

The 18 Mk82s number is possible for a loadout with 3 TERs (2 on the outer wings and 1 in the centerline) with no fuel tanks and probably missiles.

2 Likes