M60 - US Forces in Federal Republic of Germany - c. 1964

Well, it’s not going to be this one – obviously Tamiya’s artwork for their 1/48 rendition way back when; shown here just to get your attention!

As a weird sort of add-on effect, I’ve got a thing going on at the moment with the M48 series; granted I’ve only just done 3 models, and two of those were German, but as a mainstay of US and German forces in the Cold War, I ended up being enthused. Yet another tangent I hear you cry: you’d be right. As I only, or rather mainly, concentrate on the vehicles and equipment of NATO’s Central Region in Europe, (and have also promised myself to represent the opposition too!), I did not think that any other versions of the M48 – that is of those used by USAREUR and the Bundeswehr - had trod the soil of Europe. I then found out belatedly that the A5 version had, on exercise in Italy, by the National Guard. So, an A5 is on its way!

However, this then led me – God this hobby – endless inspiration and distractions – to think about its successor, the M60. I have a couple of M60A1s in the collection, but thought that the plain vanilla version was somewhat overlooked; certainly I don’t think I’ve seen any on the show display tables ever. I recalled that Dragon produced a version of this tank (why oh why didn’t I get one back when it came out?), and is just about I believe, the only game in town; it is also exceedingly rare. I was aware that MR Modellbau produce a conversion kit so promptly ordered one. In the meantime however, during a brief interchange of views on Leopards, and other aspects of Cold War armour, Richard Pearce kindly offered up a DEF conversion set for such an M60. He offered it gratis and it arrived earlier this week.

Nearly all of the work involves the turret; a rather daunting amount of etch(!)

And 2 pages of instructions and one of markings options:

I needed a donor kit of course, and thought the Esci/Italeri kit might suffice; after a brief rummage in the attic, I opened the box and began to test the viability of it all. For the record DEF recommend the Tamiya A3 and Academy kits. I’d also forgotten that the Esci/Italeri kit has the Driver’s hatch moulded closed, and unless one is looking to finish a model in either a combat situation, or say, on the ranges, that was not for me. I Iike to populate my models and besides, drilling it all out and removing the hatch would be a bit of a bind. I had the Tamiya kit in the stash as well so chose that one. It is really only an update of their vintage kit from 1970, and not the best kit of the M60A1 around, but with a bit of TLC I thought it would still do the job.

So, although juggling with several other projects, I thought I’d better do Richard’s generosity justice, and also give the plain vanilla version a bit of attention, as not many others seem to do so(!) It was an important tank in USAREUR’s inventory, and had to face off the fearsome T-62, which had recently deployed into East Germany.

I’d assembled just a few extras such as a metal barrel for the M85, tow ropes, a couple of jerricans, and a crew. The decal sheet that comes with the conversion kit is pretty impressive; it has suffered the trials of storage and age but hopefully will still be viable. I was particularly taken by this one (below), and a vehicle from the same unit is shown in the Tankograd booklet on the M60 series. There are others amongst the decals that are equally colourful.

(Tankograd images for discussion purposes)

First off, as per the instructions, the lower hull and suspension; as usual, inevitably this vehicle is going to be displayed as on exercise – I gave the lower hull my mud treatment using plastic putty and flock as used by the model railway fraternity. When tackling the suspension I paint as I go, and this model, from the early 60s, reinforced by the colour pics in the Tankograd publication. will be painted in the almost black green finish, but that is some way off. Humbrol 66, which caused me no end of grief on my earlier USAREUR M48A2 project, will actually be my friend here.

Modifications to the suspension were duly carried out, the main one being the deletion of a hydraulic suspension arm at the front, and the non-installation of lifting rings along the hull side.; given that the hull is based on the original Tamiya criterion for motorisation, there were a few gaps to fill, accomplished by plastic card and putty.

I had to remove the moulded on phone box and will have to scratch a replacement, which even I, with my limited skills, should be able to accomplish. Those pesky stowage brackets, which Tamiya and others seem to perpetuate on their models’ mudguards, were also sanded off. I sprayed the interior front of the hull white, just in case some of it is visible; with a Driver figure not that much will show. There was also a moulding “dip” on the glacis which I filled with putty.

And then, on to track hell; I thought that etched foliage was punishing but I’ve no real option than to labour over the individual AFV Club tracks which came with the conversion. Two knock-out marks on every last track link. My technique in dealing with this (apart from normally, indulging in copious remedial amounts of gin) involves me sanding them down with initially a grade 120 from my Mig Ammo sanding sticks, followed by a 230; this seems to be effective enough, yet does produce quite an amount of fine back residue, so I mask up; don’t want to catch cancer do we? Hah! Immediately after this, and I can only manage about 20 at a time, I pop them in a small bowl of water, and when a batch is done, give them a wash by adding detergent. This ensures that any residue is removed. The comes the tedious assembly; a strain on both dexterity and eyesight, and I only fit the end connectors 3 at a time, but in fairness to AFV Club, their methodology of adding these is quite innovative.

Knock out marks on every track link, but obviously worth the work. I’ve still around another 50 to do; I competed one run though - that’s why most of today seems to have evaporated(!)

And that folks is where I’m at, at the moment. Track hell!

So, I will leave you with the model resting on what ultimately, will be its base:

21 Likes

As usual, hoist by my own petard; could someone with the knowledge of the arcane, amend the sub-titled info that proclaims “1/48” and amend to “1/35”. Thanks in advance.

A slick 60, too cool. I’ve done a few myself, one of my favorite builds. I’ve used the DEF turret for one, very very nice part. The basket can be rough but I did grab a Chesapeake turret a while ago that had a very good jig for it that I’ve used a couple of times since. I even got desperate enough one time to use a scavenged turret from a very old build of the Academy Magach 7C. I still have one Dragon turret in the stash that’s waiting for a build…
The only thing(s) I might say regarding using the Tamiya kit are to delete the night vision device on the driver’s hatch (if it’s there on your kit) and less noticeable and probably too late on your build is to check the spacing of the first two return rollers. The slick had the same spacing on both sides due to having no shock on the second road wheel station.
The two US versions I did were fun…
IMG_3700 by Russel Baer, on Flickr
…but the IDF versions were more fun.

9 Likes

Thanks Russel, I didn’t know about the return rollers, and certainly missed it. I might be able to do a regain though; it’ll involve some not very pretty hacking, but to be honest, the details won’t be visible once the hull top and tracks are in place.

I’m not too sure what the night vision device is, or looks like; this is what the Tamiya kit has given me:

I also sanded down the central periscope as I learned that if the Driver was driving with his head out, he couldn’t see properly so the periscope was lowered. I’ll make it look like the others in due course, as I do indeed, wish to have a driver installed. Do you have take on that?

Nice builds by the way; clearly I was wrong in my opinion that no one else bothers with the beast!

9 Likes

I have built the Dragon kit. When I got to Germany in '75, that was the first tank I crewed, before we swapped them for M60A2s. There should be 2 grooves on either side of the center driver’s periscope, as rain gutters I suppose

11 Likes

Roger that Carl; do you have a pic of that? I’d like to get it right if I can.

The cam scheme is interesting - is that an early version of the MASSTER camouflage?

3 Likes

Loving this topic!
Here’s the drivers hole with the water channels.
The hatch provided by Tamiya is for an M60A3 and designed for the drivers night vision scope


This, I believe…

5 Likes

Thanks for that James; 'looks just like the sort of sanding scar my injudicious modelling might cause (!)

Right, so the Tamiya A3 hatch - as I showed earlier - appears to have a fitting presumably for just that; the solution would seem to be to sand it off. Would that be right?

Just got to say folks, thanks for all the chipping in even at this early stage. All very helpful.

4 Likes

If you can get it to look like the one in the pic I posted you’ll be good to go :+1:t3:
Looks to me like some round styrene sanded to a dome with a rectangle on top sanded to same shape with a hinge on the back :man_shrugging:t2:

1 Like

Loaders hatch, but looks like the exact same periscope mount

4 Likes

Got it; a relatively simple enough fix. Thanks!

1 Like

You’re welcome!
I’ll be watching :+1:t3:

2 Likes

Hah! No pressure then!

3 Likes

The provided “flap” (I can’t remember what it was called-I served on 'A3’s for many years) in the drivers hatch to allow the drivers night viewer to be installed is incorrect for your version.

The driver’s periscope in the middle should be down to not get in his way while driving open hatch (it had a catch to hold in the lowered position, but the side scopes should be up as they don’t have that feature. I’m not sure what you are getting at here in the photo.

1 Like

Here is a drivers hatch from a M48A5 and I think it is correct for your kit.

1 Like

Hmmm, lol

1 Like

Right; as I understand it then, the central 'scope should be lowered, as I wish to depict a Driver. The ones either side should be raised. Got it.

(I’m not sure what I’m on about re a photo either).

Thanks again every body who has taken time to assist. In the meantime, I’ve return rollers to relocate, some re-fettling to undertake around the Driver’s position,and a zillion track links to assemble.

3 Likes

My effort from 25 years ago:


Modified ESCI hull and commander’s cupola, Academy M48A5 turret with epoxy putty for the altered rear, and AFV Club tracks.

BTW, the headlight guards on both Tamiya and ESCI/Italeri kits are poor but easily improved:

I used to file them down from the back and then glue a piece of plastic strip to make it L-angle iron. For the M60 the strip goes at the top, but for the -A1 and later it’s at the bottom.

9 Likes

Crikey Brian.Off on a flyer with the M60.Interesting read and a gathered frong to view your progress.I think you were wise adding Gin to the equation,Be rude not to.

Enjoy.

1 Like

A man after my own heart Jakko; I’d identified the M60 as being a recipient of the MASSTER scheme when I first encountered the old Signal Squadron book, reinforced by an article in an equally ancient copy of Military Modelling magazine. The Signal Squadron effort has scale drawings so I’ve no excuse for getting the spacing of the return rollers wrong.

This pic (above)also appears in the aforementioned Tankograd book.

I do have plans, depending on how I get on with this project, of producing one in the same finish as yours. Re the supporting strut for the light guards, do you mean that on the M60 it’s actually a “T” shape in cross view, and the A1 “L”, if you see what I mean? On this particular pic it appears that it’s an “L” shape, but then, that could have been a repair subsequent to its monument status:

Despite scouring lots of walkarounds, I’m still not completely sure which.

7 Likes