It needs seat belts, a NHRA certified roll cage and NASCAR window webbing mesh over all access openings…
Cheers,
M
It needs seat belts, a NHRA certified roll cage and NASCAR window webbing mesh over all access openings…
Cheers,
M
With those modifications, I think it should also be available as an amusement park ride.
GM Defense, the same manufacturer of the Infantry Squad Vehicle (ISV), also makes the Light Utility Vehicle (LUV) that has a cabin, HVAC, glass, windshield, doors, etc. to remedy the deficiencies of the open and unarmored ISV. The LUV can be armed with a RWS and armored depending on customer preferences. It won’t seat nine Soldiers or Marines, just 4-5 troops, but it’s a full pickup when the ISV is an open buggy of sorts. It can seat more troops with the extended six-door cab.
Photo from Military.com
Check out this person’s Gallery with photos of LUV, MRZR, M2A3 Bradley, M-SHORAD Stryker, and ISV if you scroll right.
Tacomas suited us just fine in '02.
Can’t find the original without the quote at the moment. It’s late. Lifted it off an old thread.
USSOCOM often armors their pickups and SUVs to resemble commercial civilian vehicles.
The GM Defense LUV, being beefier, can come with a .50cal CROWS II-Javelin mounting a C-UAS jammer and two loitering munitions in the cargo bed. Behind the CROWS-Javelin is a small UAV with docking ring. That is quite heavy well-balanced offensive and defensive armament with stand-off range. There’s no hiding the fact that the LUV is armed and armored like a USSOCOM pickup or SUV that is supposed to blend into the local surroundings.
Toyota Tacomas can have the loitering munitions in the cargo bed, but I doubt that they can mount the CROWS-Javelin over the cab.
I haven’t heard or read any US Defense service interested in the GM Defense LUV just yet. GM Defense markets their Light Utility Vehicle as a HMMWV replacement, able to seat the same amount of troops and offer better more modern capabilities because it’s a pickup.
Photo from Sandboxx News.
This is nothing more then a modified Chevy Colorado with a diesel engine in it
I hate modern vehicles - whether armoured (ostensibly|) or not; they just end up looking like armoured vans - I admit that this one does not - but where is the angularity and almost purpose of such amroured plate in, say, vehicles like the Ferret?
I mean:
Panther - armoured van.
Dingo - armoured van
Typhoon - armoured van
Ferret - looks the business!
I won’t dabble in tracked vehicles but to my (clearly distorted) mind, the CVR(T) series looked interesting and right; ditto the Bundeswehr use of the Hotchkiss:
And this Dutch prototype which never came to fruition:
Perhaps it’s just me!
PS: I know I’m confusing the issue here in that the Humvee replacement is not necessarily a dedicated recce vehicle just my Sunday morning musings!
Seriously? Unless it can Handle IEDs It’s useless
Didn’t Canada buy these?
Not necessarily. In our AO EIDs were going off all the time. Our gun trucks never got hit. A few close calls maybe. The insurgents had certain TTPs. So did we. Unpredictability - changing routes, driving on the “wrong” side of the road. Not using the road at all. Knowing what to watch for - trash piled next to the road, a stack of rocks (if I can find my photo I’ll post it) different colored concrete, a hose in the road, a shi+bird standing in the middle of nowhere talking on a cell phone. As the gunner it was my primary responsibility to watch for threats, since I had the best view and the biggest gun.
And of course knowing the enemy’s TTPs. In certain areas they liked to use HME, a low yield explosive made from goat urine. Because it was “slower” it would not fracture a gun truck, but it was excellent at flipping vehicles over into things like irrigation canals, of which there were many. And then there was our motto - Speed is security.
Yes, that is the six-door Light Utility Vehicle version, which may seat nine Soldiers perhaps. It was called the GM Defense “Next-Generation Tactical Truck,” but they changed the name because there are two versions of “Next-Generation”…one that looks like an ordinary pickup (LUV) and one that looks futuristic and Sci-Fi (see below).
As you can see, it remedies a lot of the deficiencies of the open and unarmored Infantry Squad Vehicle although I don’t know if the six-door LUV can be armored as the doors and windows are plastic tarps.
And then GM Defense also makes this…the “Next-Generation Light Tactical Wheeled Vehicle” prototype. There is definitely no hiding that this is a military vehicle, and it is fully enclosed and looks like it sports armor and definitely RWS armament. Reporters haven’t really covered the “Light Tactical Wheeled Vehicle” and I haven’t read any interest in it. (That is the Infantry Squad Vehicle right next to it).
Photo from Defense News.
Many modern armored 4x4 vehicles resemble armored bank trucks because they need to have the internal passenger volume to transport a large number of S.W.A.T. personnel. The Lenco Bearcat G3 can carry 8 to 15 tactical police.
The Lenco Bearcat G3 can stand repeated hits by .50cal bullets, and the sales video showed the MIL-SPEC steel armor plate that sustained it, complete with zero-angle of deflection. None of the bullets penetrated.
No, I get all that Peter; my comment was slightly tongue in cheek. To me, they just look dull!
Got it.
@BootsDMS
I haven’t stumbled across the stacked rocks used to possibly calculate our speed, but I did find this one:
Looks like an OP in the distance. Is the distance between the tractor and the EFP about 100 meters? RPG in culvert?
A whole bunch of heebie jeebie signs, it also looks too perfect. Was this set-up for TTP run throughs?
Stealth version?
Real world. I know - it looks textbook. There’s even cover and concealment right next to the X for a follow on assault after the initial ambush. I’ve got more. I would take a photo, send the grid to higher and we’d move on,