Hi guys,
I wonder if the Vismod version of the M-109 ever was painted in some kind of camouflage.
I seen the M-551 version of the Shilka in camouflage, but could not find any pictures of the M-109.
Anyone any suggestions ?
TIA.
Gé
Hi guys,
I wonder if the Vismod version of the M-109 ever was painted in some kind of camouflage.
I seen the M-551 version of the Shilka in camouflage, but could not find any pictures of the M-109.
Anyone any suggestions ?
TIA.
Gé
Hi Frenchy,
Hi, I have seen those pictures, but i was wondering if anyone did see one in camouflage.
Gé
Since Soviet vehicles at that time were plain green, why but a camo on it?
Speaking of Vismods, does anyone have photos of an M113A3 “disguised” as 2S6 Tunguska?
Thanks for all the input.
Just what i thought, no camo !
Gé
One more last question: would there be Army unit markings on the vehicle.
Not the ones from 11 Acr, but from 177th armored brigade.
Gé
For the vehicles specifically called out; the M109/ZSU and the M113/2S6 no. They were not used by 177 AR. Most of their vehicles were M551 Sheridan based. Some examples of their markings:
Paint and markings varied a lot over the years, but in many photos unit markings are missing, covered in dust, or difficult to make out.
Ken
Hi Ken,
If the m109/zsu was not used by 177ar, then which unit did use the vehicles as seen in the first 3 pictures.
Gé
I have no idea. The photos are from the 1970s and I cannot make out the unit patches. The terrain is far too green and tree covered to be Ft Irwin.
Ken
Here’s the caption for the first picture from the US National Archives
“A defense weapons system with gun dish fire control radar and quad 40 mm anti-aircraft guns mounted on an M109 chassis, is used to simulate a Soviet ZSU-23-4 during the Joint Attack Weapons System exercise, novembre 20, 1977
The original finding aid described this photograph as: Base: Fort Ord State: California (CA) Country: United States Of America (USA) Scene Camera Operator: Unknown Release Status: Released to Public.”
I know the big argument will always be monetary budgets and restraints, but it looks like the US OPFOR vehicles have a look more thought and design put into them than the UK versions … Are the last set of images from Ken @tankerken the most modern OPFOR wagons in play ?
Newcomers…
Members of WestEfx Military Services work to install a T-72 VISMOD kit on an Idaho Army National Guard M1097 Humvee.
An Army Humvee-type vehicle being used to emulate a Russian GAZ Tigr. (Credit: 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment)
An Army FMTV-series 6x6 truck meant to emulate a French CAESAR self-propelled howitzer
H.P.
I think the jury is out on that one … If you are trying to make it look like a 72 … it needs tracks
Cheers H.P … that brought a smile … That really does look hideous beyond words …
Way better than aiming at stacks of tires. I cannot recall what was the difference between stack A being a tank and stack B being a AFV/BMP. Might have been the quality, color, geometry symbol on a panel near by. Had the same issue on the range as well.
Stack of tires bad, me shoot tires.