M790 EL Pershing II missile MGM-31C w/ M1001 Tractor build

The M1001 has a bunch of complex sub assemblies that I decided to build before I started assembling the running gear and suspension.

Or as I was told way back when I was a lowly apprentice mechanic, always do the hard stuff first because everything after is gravy.

I’ve decided to build the power plant, 30KW generator and the crane and its platform first.

With all the mentions of cranes lately, I figured @HeavyArty , @165thspc and the HEMTT 3D printer dude would be interested in the crane assembly.

It’s a bit fiddly and covers two full pages of instruction and nearly two sprues of parts.

It also has metal tubes for the hydraulic cylinders.

Anyhow, it’s fully articulated and will telescope if you’re careful when it’s assembled.

It’s even got internal stops to limit the travel of the telescoping beams.

s

And I’m only halfway through its assembly.

9 Likes

Nice. The crane is looking good.

4 Likes

This crane is ridiculous.

It has all the manifolds for the hydraulic hoses but no hoses or instructions (thank God). Oddly enough no cable either, although it would be easy to figure out.

This will all be collapsed when it’s mounted on the truck anyway.

8 Likes

Very nice. I wish we had a HEMTT crane that detailed and workable.

2 Likes

That’s the first ILK M65 I’ve seen built.

KL

2 Likes

Matt, you should be happy to read the 1988 slideshow on decommissioning


:

I doubt the cost of the recoverables is anywhere near the value of recovered items, but there’s an argument to be made that we got our money’s worth for this because it didn’t have to be used.

KL

3 Likes

Two things to note here:

  1. I don’t recall ever seeing a PERSHING painted in camouflage, but apparently some were.

  2. The stenciling on the missiles was voluminous. Arch, how much stenciling does the kit provide?

KL

3 Likes

Hey Kurt,
Thanks for the recovery cost slides. It’s ann interesting addendum to the technical history stuff I’ve read. Martin Marietta really cleaned up on that, huh?

As far as stenciling on the Pershing missle goes, the kit has got some but nowhere near as many as you’d find on the Trumpeter SA2 Guideline missile, if you’ve ever built one of those. It’s completely covered in stencils.

From the painting guide:

4 Likes

It’s hard to say, but probably not.

Most development contracts are Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee, meaning the Government covers allowable costs plus a fee to the contractor. The fee is normally around 1.5% to 2.5% of the contract value at signing (not a percentage of incurred costs - that sort of contract has been illegal since WW I.) Fixed-Price production contracts normally include a 8-12% profit built in. That’s seems nice but most people don’t realize that contracts over $1 million are normally “reconciled” after completion. If a company cuts costs and makes a larger profit, the auditors can come back and get a refund.

One thing I didn’t even know until I’d been in defense contracting for 20 years is that the Government sets the rates you can charge for labor, overhead, etc. The contractor’s costs are audited and specific rules are applied to account for inflation, productivity increases, and future drivers. This is what you have to use in your contract bids, no more, no less. This prevents companies from claiming that they pay their workers $100/hr or from low-balling their rates to win an order then skimping on the work to stay alive.

Still, many people think contractors get a lot of sweet deals compared to their local hardware store, but the fact is, if the Government didn’t keep contracting somewhat attractive they wouldn’t find anyone to do it.

KL

5 Likes

Very enlightening- Thanks Kurt

2 Likes

Kurt, do you have any Pershing pictures you’d be willing to share?

I’ve never actually seen the missile, although I do recall seeing an upright missile prominently displayed on a main drag in Ft Sill in the 1968-71 time period. I think it was a Pershing 1A? Near the flag pole and the parade ground?

In 1963-66 Germany, I do recall seeing a couple of M474 tracked carriers parked outside a motor pool building in Germany once. They were both emptied of their loads.

As I understand it, the loads were all interchangeable between one M474. They could all carry the warhead, launcher, radar unit or the generator/control shed.

In 1964 or 65 while we were in Germany, my dad took me to the field for an afternoon. I was 9 or 10 yo at the time. I remember there was snow on the ground and we ate a meal after the troops were all served. I also remember asking if I could see one of the missiles.

He replied “No, and don’t ask again.”

Yessir….

3 Likes

I thought I had some from Huntsville where there is a XM474 and missile on display but they are in one of about 30 shoe boxes of pictures. I don’t think I took many because a) film and developing cost money, and, b) I knew I was never going to scratchbuild one, so why take a zillion photos?

There’s a PII along with an SS-20 at the Air and Space Museum but don’t remember if it is downtown or at Dulles. (Their website says it’s in storage . . .)

The Pershing wasn’t really in my area of modeling interest - too complicated a system, and too hard to find information. I’m waiting for a SERGEANT kit so I can put a biological warhead on it.

In my first job I worked at the plant that made the first and second stage rocket motors of the PII. I went back in '88 or so with my second company as part of a joint venture and the whole plant had a double fence so that the Soviet reps could drive around the perimeter and make sure we weren’t restarting production.

KL

4 Likes

Thanks Kurt, I get it.

I’m within 45 minutes of A&S in DC and Dulles.
Haven’t been to the downtown locations since the 90s and I’ve been to the Dulles location as recently as 10 years ago. Don’t recall a Pershing at either one but I’ll check back….

The crane base sans al the control levers, lock handles, shut off levers and jack feet that I’m sure would all be bent sideways before it made it on to the truck:

Mock up with crane

And the excellent 30KW generator

7 Likes

This is really a great build Al… And that crane, what a beauty… shame it will be folded up though… Great work :+1:

2 Likes

The PII was in the main (downtown) building of the NASM, I don’t know where it is currently, last time I saw it was early 2000s. However, there are photos of it on the web:



This photo looks like a newer one at the Dulles location:

Ken

6 Likes

Thanks John. I was surprised it took so much longer to assemble the platform than the crane. Two full sprues worth of parts for both.

No matter how carefully I sand, scrape or pare parts, as soon as I post pictures I see a bunch of stuff that needs attention: seams and nibs that I couldn’t see beforehand.

Thanks Ken for the Pershing pictures from DC.

If time allows, I’m going to start on the basic frame today. I’m running out of parts….

4 Likes

The camera, especially now with the ease of digital cameras, is your best friend and worst enemy when it comes to revealing things.
Start using it as a tool, take pictures and examine them.
The “eyesight” on those cameras are better than ours ever were or will ever be.
We’ll just have to live with it and enjoy the h*eck out of it
:grin:

3 Likes

I suppose there’s always this way too. One advantage (or disadvantage)….

10 Likes

Oooohhh!
Heavy!
:+1: :smile:

2 Likes

Damn, guns, tanks and rock & roll!

2 Likes