https://x.com/Osinttechnical/status/1724657079334449514?s=20
D9 clearing street.
2 Likes
Now that’s a street sweeper!
1 Like
H.P.
1 Like
:focal(3908x2614:3918x2604)/cloudfront-eu-central-1.images.arcpublishing.com/ipmgroup/ENYNHASQTJF5VHWS4JJYTTU5TM.jpg)
H.P.
2 Likes
We need a new tool US/IDF M1064A3 mortar carrier
5 Likes
i think AFV Club was setting up two new M113 kits; an M1064 and an M1068, but dunno what happened
1 Like
H.P.
This, Iron Sting, thank you, come again…
2 Likes
H.P.
2 Likes
AFV was also “doing” an M992 FAASV……still waiting
2 Likes
Another view of the captured Badr-3 rockets
H.P.
1 Like
I guess one of the most surprising things of all these pictures is the “streets/roads”, or lack there of. The amount of all the soft beach like sand in amidst all the big buildings, is just not what i expected. And several of the urban settings have that deep beach sand.
4 Likes
They look more like propaganda props to me than the real thing. The rear ends are welded shut and there is nothing that looks like a engine or similar.
Those look like some sort of protective cover for the nozzle. There is some sort of wire/cable coming out of the center of the cover. Perhaps a lead for the firing apparatus? If it was a welded on cover, there would be no need for such a cable wire.
Some in loading have the same sort of cover.
1 Like
Here is what is puzzling me. One can see examples similar to the photo below, where the rear end has a wire sticking out and the “cover” is “inwards” the tube.
In this photo, shared previously here, the rear end is welded flush to the tube end
And this is a closeup from an AlJazeera video
and this is a tweet showing the propellant and the rear end
If what the IDF found was the real thing the rear of the missile should be different
1 Like
https://www.israeldefense.co.il/en/node/60387
If these are mock-ups, why do they bother to take them back home ? 
H.P.
1 Like
I had the same thought in seeing these shots from the past several week, no concrete?
