Group Build Description: Last year people gave Klaus-Adler some grief about what could be included in the tank destroyer campaign. It seems there was quite a bit of interest in (mostly odd) things for destroying tanks, but weren’t what we think of as a tank destroyer. This is for that stuff. Some examples - a TOW mounted on a jeep, an ATR on a motorcycle, various technicals with anti-tank capabilities, infantry carried anti-tank weapons. So roughly anything put together for destroying tanks but that is not a tank or a tank destroyer. How does this sound to folks?
Event Details: (Remember to click “Going” if you want to join the build!)
Completion Award: [add info about possible award badge here - see help threads for more info]
A Note about Awards: The following text is a reminder that in order for people participating and finishing their projects to receive a badge on their forum profile, they will need to provide their account username to the group build leader by the completion date of the build. The leader will then provide this list to the site admin who will bulk award the badges to those users who have finished the group build. If you don’t provide your username or finish the project on the timetable the leader has setup you will not be able to receive an award.
Probably won’t get started until later in the year, but I’ve been looking for a reason to build an M38 with an M40 recoilless on the back. Count me in!
Getting away from the silliness… and given the issues last year, maybe define some lines here so people are guided to the choices. Maybe you can elaborate more like:
So basically eligibility is that it is not a Tank or a specifically purpose built Tank Destroyer . e.g No Marders, M10’s, PanzerJager 1, Archer, etc. but one where a vehicle had a form of AT weapon mounted as part of widening the original purpose of the host vehicle.
It might also help to have an up front ruling on something like:
a M113 APC with a recoilless rifle or TOW (Not like an M901 ITV)
the FV432 with a Wombat
Sdkfz 250 with Pak 36
Israeli M3 Halftrack with SS11 launcher
as to whether these fit the bill or they are considered more purpose design?
And lastly, are stand alone A/T artillery pieces excluded?
The 8.8 cm Raketenwerfer 43 Puppchen was meant to be towed, but could be manhandled …
Your the ring master for this one so if that’s what you want ok but I would recommend changing this sentence to let folks know it’s just for ground type vehicles.