So the same problem we have in the English-speaking world?
First off, the title of the thread is very concise. It letâs the reader know that the subject is probably not truck, railroad, or decal related. I tend to read titles to threads before I read them only to find out theyâre not related to strippers or silent films from the 20âs, thus avoiding some bit of disappointment.
As for the genius of Ginoâs moderating skills - remember this thread?
Due to Ginoâs disdain for the title of the thread, and subsequently changing it, Kraftstoff (who by any measure is one hell of a modeler) no longer contributes to the forum. Youâll notice further down the thread he doesnât even respond to your request for more photos.
He also pointedly ignores you in another Railroad thread why he hasnât posted in a while.
I"m not speaking out of turn here - weâve communicated since then and he has authorized me to say the whole Gino incident - changing the title to his thread because Gino didnât like it, pit him off in a big way.
To other modelers have quit the site for different reasons, but same guy.
Iâd suggest to anyone who doesnât care for the content of a thread - donât read it. If it wanders off in a tangent as many do, who cares? Itâs a modeling site, not a cancer curing forum.
I imagine advertisers donât care either, as long as youâre clicking on the thread to see what itâs all about, But when readership declines and interesting, talented people no longer post, we all suffer.
Have I missed something big? One minute weâre sharing jokes about language, then suddenly a rant about editing? This needs a whole lot more explanation. Exactly which topics were merged/edited? And what exactly was the effect? If, as a reader of an âOddities of languageâ thread Iâm getting forcibly drawn into an unrelated fight then I fully expect to be presented with ALL the necessary details.
This topic was created by moving a bunch of posts from another topic.
Which is also why I have spoken in the past in support of using thread titles that actually give the reader some idea of what they can expect as they open a topic instead of using some near-indecipherable coded title that only the author understands.
Again I am highly relieved that the now 100+ posts in this thread ARE NOT still part of the âScratch Built & Conversionsâ topic! They were quickly muddying the waters of that conversation.
Robin @Uncle-Heavy thank you for clarifying where this topic originated. So much time has passed I had lost track of itsâ origins.
I had to scroll to the top to check because I had lost track as well âŚ
Trust me, you missed nothing. Thatâs sort of my point. Wasting time playing Junior Editor and pissing people off isnât my idea of helping keep viewership.
I see - they were pulled out of one topic as being OT and placed here? Assuming a suitable pointer was dropped into the old thread I fail to see why or how that action became a fight. Care to fill us all in on that side of it? If itâs going to be brought up here as a complaint Iâd like to know more.
LOL! Looks like Iâm the guilty culprit who derailed the Scratch Build Conversion thread. Didnât realize âRaketengetrieben Glockenspielâ was such a powerful phrase
Got to be more careful with the âRaketengetrieben GlockenspielââŚgreat power much responsibility etcâŚwink
Thank goodness you didnât type âsupercalifragilisticexpialidociousâ! Who knows what could have happened?..
Thank you for reminding me about this little jewel from the internet:
"Mahatma Gandhi walked barefoot most of the time, which produced an impressive set of calluses on his feet. He also ate little, which made him frail and with his odd diet he suffered from bad breath.
This made him a super calloused fragile mystic hexed by halitosis."