Wade's World Reviews - Various AFV’s

@HMJuanjo Juan,

¡Gracias por tomarse el tiempo de leer y responder! ¡Muy apreciado! Estoy de acuerdo, hay una gran sensación al volver a lo básico con la construcción de modelos con un kit más antiguo. Estoy muy feliz de que Tamiya Panther A haya sido una construcción de fondos para usted y el cliente. ¡La banda elástica siempre está un poco incompleta!

¡Gracias de nuevo! k


Juan,

Thank you for taking the time to read and reply! Much appreciated! I agree, there’s a great feeling with getting back to basic with model building wirh an older kit. Very happy the Tamiya Panther A was a fund build for you and the client. The rubber band are always a little sketchy!

Thank you again! Kind regards from the USA, Wade

3 Likes

1/35 Tamiya Panzer 38(t) E/F

5 Price $32 (Amazon Prime, free shipping June 2023)

5 Instructions - they are clear & concise, tricky steps have recommended sequence of assembly numbers, state of the art excellence.

5 Molding Quality - one small trace of flash on crisp parts that were free of blemishes and free of defects

5 Plastic Quality - The Goldie Locks blend of soft and easy to clean up but tough enough to allow Tamiya Extra Thin cement to be used if desired.

5 Parts Clean Up - Easy, not time intensive

5 Ease of build - Best I’ve ever seen

5 Accuracy - wingnuts, rivets, crisp molded in clamps, awesome MG, it all appears correct. I don’t have Panzer Tracts for this vehicle so can’t comment on the plan drawing level accuracy.

4 Fit - Excellent overall. Two piece muffler required finesse and bit of putty, had a couple of hair lines that might have been ok but applied a thinned coat of Tamiya basic. Jerry can straps don’t meet up and need filling in my opinion.

4 Doesn’t Require Aftermarket - All of the parts in the box are perfectly suitable for most modelers and useable. However, this kit has the cursed link & length tracks with punch marks on inside face. In my view link & length tracks are a major negative. The fussy OCD modeler (me) will be happier with aftermarket individual link tracks.

5 Details built Out of the Box - wingnuts, rivets, crisp molded in clamps, awesome MG, seems on the money but I’m far from an expert on this vehicle.

48 points out of 50 possible

48/50 => 96%

Outstanding kit, highly recommended. Very pleasing model that builds quickly and hassle free. Fruilmodel tracks were the icing on the cake :birthday: on my opinion.

9 Likes

Wade’s World Build Review & Rating

I’d looked forward to building this kit for a very long time and was delighted when it arrived from Cyber-Hobby.

4 Price - Cost $43 via Cyber-Hobby slow boat order and $75 via Sprue Brother’s for my two copies of the kit

2 Instructions - Lot’s of mistakes by Dragon. It’s a pity in my opinion Dragon doesn’t address this consistent weakness with some basic quality checks.

4 Mold Quality - Uneven, some is outstanding state of the art like the MG42 and some is lackluster. Overall is pretty good. I’m happy with this aspect of the kit.

5 Plastic Quality - Excellent, high-quality, holds up to Tamiya Extra Thin and easy enough to clean up.

4 Parts Clean Up - Lots of nubs meant less punch marks on parts. Overall pretty good.

3 Ease of build - The PE roof plate was annoying as hell to securely fit in my experience.

Hull assembly is complex. Good part clean up is critical. Add interior parts plus a turret and interior, this makes for a fairly complex halftrack kit to my eyes. It all comes together reasonably well. Overall, PE is only used when it’s needed and that’s very good in my opinion.

There was stowage locker issue that was my fault and had no bearing on the rating.

5 Accuracy - While a paper panzer etc for all practical purposes seems very good.

4 Fit - Due to complexity of subassemblies that make up the hull. Every thing fits well enough if due diligence is taken in parts clean up and assembly there shouldn’t be major issues.

5 Doesn’t Require Aftermarket - All of the parts in the box are perfectly suitable for most modelers and useable. The headlight is weakest link in this chain in my opinion.

4 Details built Out of the Box - tool clamps level detail is sometimes missing. Overall excellent.

**40 out 50 possible **

40/50 => 80%

Highly Recommended, most especially if the modeler has something like an old Tamiya 251D halftrack in the stash as this kit has many potential hand me down extra parts. Example seats, squad, squad weapons, entire extra set of tracks etc.

10 Likes

By accounts, the whole body of every Dragon Sd.Kfz. 251 is about 3 mm too narrow, though.

3 Likes

I agree with you about tracks. Hate link n length. Either give me workables, or rubber band tracks (where appropriate). This in-between (or indy tracks you have to glue together) never work for me…

Damon.

4 Likes

Jakko, thank you.

I’ll happily harpoon Dragon point or two for that blunder in future 251/real reviews.

2 Likes

Dragon Puma 234/2

3 Price ~$88 MSRP (wtf?), Spruebrothers.com $70, (via Cyber-Hobby, I paid $47.39 w/free shipping)

4 Instructions Overall very good for Dragon, zero glaring issues, parts placement is reasonably clear.

3 Molding Quality Not at all impressed, kit looks older than it’s age (2006). Too many soft looking details.

4 Plastic Quality Serviceable hard gray Dragon plastic

4 Parts Clean Up Much better than the typical Dragon kit. Wheels are very well designed. The new copper color PE is much easier to cut and clean than the old nickel-silver color PE. 3D printed muzzle brake is excellent and already cleaned.

5 Ease of build Suspension is a fiddly but everything fits well enough. Keyed barrel and keyed 3D muzzle brake are nice. Easy to place in proper orientation.

4 Accuracy I’m without reference on this vehicle. Kit looks reasonable. With the soft details there’s room for improvements.

5 Fit Best fitting Dragon kit, I’ve built in 1/35 scale. Very impressed :clap:

5 Doesn’t Require Aftermarket metal barrel, metal smoke grenade launchers & canisters, 3D muzzle brake plus PE, clear periscopes, two sets of wheels, fantastic for one box! The kit turret MG sucks and replaced with a turned Aber brass barrel but this is very minor. A+ for Dragon.

4 Details built Out of the Box former Panzer Police will be just a hair grumpy tool clasps and clamps aren’t provided.

** 41 points out of 50 **

41/50 => 82%

41/50 is a very good score overall, probably the highest I’ve ever awarded to any Dragon kit. If THIS 2023 Premium Edition kit can be acquired at an acceptable price, it’s recommended. I’d pass on other Dragon kit versions of the Puma unless they have the cool 3D muzzle brake & other metal parts.

With two new 1/35 Puma releases, one Ryefield and one from Mini-Art, there’s no shortage of quality new Puma kits available.

Despite the 41/50 score, I wouldn’t purchase this kit again for $47. The Ryefield Model’s kit would be my choice and hopefully will follow as a build one day.

7 Likes

Wade’s World! Model Time! - and it’s a kit that I couldn’t wait to get in 2002 but soon grew to hate…

Dragon #6164 Kursk Panther D

Unfortunately, the Panther D kit #6164 Dragon released wasn’t a Kursk spec Panther. That is reflected with my harsh rating of this kit because it’s a pig in poke as advertised on the box label, in my opinion.

3 Price $45 to $58 (now? LOL!) vs ~ $35 in 2002, I wouldn’t pay ~$2 for another copy of this kit today.

2 Instructions - poor with crappy pictures, lousey parts placement, you’ll likely need reference to help supplement construction. These are the God-awful color picture style instructions that are among the worst least readable Dragon has offered.

3 Molding Quality - pretty good, bolt details etc still soft vs Tamiya of that era in my opinion.

5 Plastic Quality - much better my last few newer era Dragon kits.

3 Parts Clean Up - nasty punch marks, wheel faces, tracks inside face and many exterior parts, lots of attachment points etc

2 Ease of build Based on old school individual link non magic tracks, finicky hull alignment front seams, overall a lot seams for an armor model, main gun, main gun cleaning kit, turret face dove tail & cupola. Some modelers aren’t ready for that much seam work in an AFV kit

0 Accuracy - Another Epic Dragon Fail

Box says Kursk Panther D but technically the model in the box doesn’t have the correct parts or instructions to build a Kursk Panther D.

I’m harsh and view this as false advertising due to ignorance on Dragon’s part, hence the zero. I bought three copies of this bastard when it was a new release based on it being what was advertised on the box. Multiple kits allow a Panzer Police to cherry pick the absolute best part for a fully optimized build. This worked well back in the day but backfired for this kit.

4 Fit While I had issue with upper and lower hull, not convinced (yet) that is a serial issue and give Dragon benefit of doubt. Overall kit fits well with meticulous part clean up. Very surprised smoke dischargers fit perfect.

0 Doesn’t Require Aftermarket Needs engine deck screens, benefits from many additional aftermarket parts. Unless you want to drill out the guide teeth in the track links (I did), new quality aftermarket tracks are worthwhile. Despite modifying the kit tracks they were still lacking and were eventylually replaced with Quick Tracks.

3 Details built Out of the Box

25 points out of 50

25/50 => 50%

If kit had been named Panther D instead Kursk Panther D - Accuracy rating of 4 for 29 out of 50

29/59 => 58%

While I would build this kit again, I wouldn’t recommend this kit to anyone unless they are looking an old school nostalgia build.

I feel that Dragon’s #6299 Panther D Premium is a better choice if interested in a Dragon Panther D than #6164. See below for details.

Perth Military Modelling - Dragon #6299 Panther D Premium

7 Likes

This is fun! Humor in modeling is underrated.

3 Likes

Wade’s World :earth_americas: :world_map: Review
Tamiya T-55A #35257

BTW - See above, we added a new graphics package after an exhaustive E-Bored meeting.

5 Price ~$66 MSRP (wow!) (I paid ~$34 on sale back in the day) If you’re willing to make a deal with Beelzebub, I mean Bezos, to your door in 2 days for ~$43. However, most Wade’s World shopper’s will seek out Black Widow Model’s for a ~$25 to $30 deal on the kit.

Excuse me may I get a spare just in case from Beelzebub Prime, in two days baby!

Two days!

5 Instructions - The instructions convinced me to try this model in 2017 when attempting to get back to the hobby. Clear, concise and excellent.

5 Molding Quality - Perfect

5 Plastic Quality - Perfect

5 Parts Clean Up - Well designed for easy parts clean up

1 Ease of Build - Out of the box an easy 5 but realistically most folks, myself included won’t be happy these days (or even in 2002) OOTB with this kit. That natty mesh screen detracts from any model it’s installed on instead of PE screens in my opinion. It’s OK for dedicated OOTB but otherwise Lame with a capital L.

Ditto the rubber band tracks. Adding aftermarket complicated the build significantly as none of my three aftermarket sets of T-55 tracks aligned well with the Tamiya sprockets. A know issue since ~2002 but unknown by me until 2023. With much tweaking to the sprockets, the Sector35 tracks fit to an acceptable standard.

The model greatly benefits from PE details and minor scratch work adds like fuel lines etc.

There’s a lot of seam work as well, main gun, snorkel tube etc and two fuel drums. I cursed one drum like it was an airplane kit a couple of times.

4 Accuracy - Looks like a T-55A! No references etc and don’t want any. Yet look hard and you’ll see room for improvements on the kit parts like the DShK MG etc.

4 Fit - The model fits together perfectly with kit parts. It doesn’t play nice with aftermarket tracks. I believe a kit with rubber band tracks should have on spec sprockets to make track replacement hassle free.

2 Doesn’t Require Aftermarket - in 2002, the kit is a 3 or 4. Now, however this excellent kit greatly benefits from after tweaks like PE screens, fuel line kit & aftermarket tracks.

2 Details Built Out of the Box - pretty strong (3 or 4) in 2002 but lukewarm (2) today.

This is an extremely good foundation to build on and detail. Time can be spent mostly adding detail and improvements with a minimum amount spent fighting with the kit. New sprockets from Mini-Art wheels set can reduce the hassle of aftermarket tracks.

** 38 points out of 50 **

38/50 => 76%

Recommended for those wanting a great canvas to detail. If one stop shopping, “everything in one box” is what you like this might not be the kit for you.

My old phone that died, had the bare plastic before painting pictures on it.

Very pleased with the Tamiya T-55A kit as it built into one of my favorites! Tamiya made a T-55A fan out of me. I’ll snatch another for $25 on a vendor table soon…

Cheers :beers:

13 Likes

Might need to fall down a spot. T-55s can be similar to Sherman tanks with different manufactures. There are three main types: Russian, Polish and Czech. Lots of little changes between the three.

4 Likes

Ryan, I can buy that, considered a 3 etc. My impression was the TamiyaT-55A was Russian manufacture. Do we know of any blantant errors?

Checking Perth Military Modelling: reviews: tamiya t-55a for another point of view.

Given what I recall Lindburg’s terrible T-55 would be a 1 in accuracy and ESCI’s probably a 3 but I built those long ago. Haven’t tried a Mini-Art, Takom,Trumpeter or RFM T-55 yet.

2 Likes

Maybe in that context 4 is ok. I will have to look for the information but I recall things similar in these links below and not in the blatant errors category.

3 Likes

WWR - Tamiya Steel Wheel Panther G #35174

Trivia - the all steel wheels didn’t work well on the Panther as the tracks tended to crack or break under the forward road wheels.

Nostalgia - this was a top notch, highly sought after kit in 1994 with two sets of wheels, infrared device plus periscopes. It was the best overall of Tamiya’s Panther G trinity of the early 1990’s. Panzer Police would stab your eye out with an X-acto knife to lay hands on a copy this kit. It was a most holy relic. If by 1995, you didn’t have two copies, your Panzer Police membership was suspended until one was acquired.

Wizdum - Don’t stand too close to a vendor table with one of these kits for sale in the $25 to $30 range…it’s a Holy Artifact…

…and Panzer Police, although diminished from their heyday, still patrol…and some collect these holy relics… :oncoming_police_car:

2 Price $67 Amazon & Ebay, I was in at $38 back in the day for my three copies.

5 Instructions - Clear, Concise & Correct, the 3C’s. However, these kits are seldom built out of the box and the build can get complex with aftermarket add on’s.

5 Molding Quality - no flash, no short shots, no mold shift. no sink marks to speak of. Minimal mold seams for the 1990’s era

5 Plastic Quality - outstandingly good

4 Parts Clean Up - very straight forward, the tow cables are bad to clean and should be replaced. Kit track links have solid guide teeth, drilling out isn’t really fun.

3 Ease of Build - out of box (5) but this kit needs aftermarket to look correct and credible as a Panther. Adding aftermarket can be as simple as engine deck screens to as involved as a full resin interior (1). I think most will be in the middle of those extremes and based on my multiple builds of Tamiya Panther G kits in general went with (3), engine deck screens, new tracks, aber brass MG’s & antenna, metal main gun and zimmerit application. YMMV

2 Accuracy - There’s just so many areas to improve with details in WWR’s opinion even without any serious dimensional errors. Idler, jack and spare track rack, gun clean kit are lacking in my opinion etc. It’s deathy by a thousand little cuts.

However, steel wheel Panthers, in fact most Panther G’s had a reinforced armor over the top of the front hull. Tamiya missed this or decided to make the upper hull accurate only for every early Panther G’s. This is also fairly difficult to fix for later Panther G’s on this kit. There also the usually this or that is off a scale inch etc typical of 1990’s era Tamiya kits.

Takom/Das Werk’s get this correct but I don’t believe anyone else comes to mind that does. The Das Takom Werk’s Late SuperBlitz Panther G or something like that.

4 Fit - Very good with good parts clean up. Built one close to stock and built one with a ton of aftermarket including interior & engine.

2 Doesn’t Require Aftermarket The kit need basic aftermarket love when released, PE screens & new tracks at a minimum. Today this increases with more aftermarket items benefiting the model.

3 Details Built Out of the Box slap the skirts on and hide the kit tracks after super gluing them to the appropriate wheel tops and it’s passable. The engine deck won’t look exactly right without screens but the screen guards or whatever they are called help cover up the deficiency. The kit is late so zimmerit can be skipped etc.

35 out of 50

35/50 => 70%

Not Recommended

With all of the New Kids on the block plus some of the Old Kids, seem to have a superior offering, ofter at a better price with easier availability. This kit can have a place as a 1st AFV build, new to the hobby build, fun build, weekend slam, nostalgia or campaign/group build if it’s already in your stash.

6 Likes

WWR - Tamiya Panzer IV H #35209 & Panzer IV J #35181

These two kits have much commonality so they are together in one review.

Tamiya #35209 - Built kit twice and everything went super smooth. The turret skirt & side skirt railings being the most challenging part of the build to line up properly.

The second kit took 45 hours build time. This included Tamiya decal Zimmerit, some PE, detailed wheels, Aber gun barrel, RB muzzle brake, Aber MG’s, Aber 2m antenna, scratch details like chains & fender springs, added welds seams, bolts, screw heads, wing nuts (half & whole), tool clamp handles plus time for Fruilmodel tracks.

By contrast building a Dragon Pz IV F kit near out of the box took ~56 hours plus time for Fruilmodel tracks.

2nd H before paint…

2nd H after paint…

Occasionally, a semi-informed aficionado may insist all Pz IV H’s had zimmerit. Most did but there were a small number of early H models that didn’t have zimmerit.


The 1990’s & up Tamiya Pz IV family, with MSRP & typical online vendor pricing.

3 Price ~$45, but likely ~$25 to $30 from a motivated vendor at a model contest

5 Instructions 3C [Clear, concise & correct]

5 Molding Quality - 4NS [no sink marks, no short shots, no mold shift, no flash to speak of]

5 Plastic Quality - high quality Tamiya plastic blend we expect and love :heart:

3 Parts Clean Up - parts are well engineered and designed for reasonable parts clean up. Many mold seams to remove on tools, small parts & wheels. Under the fenders and behind the turret skirts & side skirts are sort of ugly, needing attention. This is often the nature of a later war Pz IV build regardless of manufacturer.

4 Ease of Build - It will be as easy or hard as you want to make it. Out of the box or near, it’s easy. The various raw opening need sheet plastic to seal them etc like engine deck grills & driver visor.

Get radical, go full TriStar suspension to address multiple deficiencies in the kits parts, add zimmerit, scratch details, and PE, it’s possible to make this build…difficult :wink:

1 Accuracy - Even Monogram’s old Panzer IV kit from 1970 has several weld seams on the turret and hull Tamiya missed!

In 1990’s, I’d have rated it a “3” but today there just so many newer kits with refined details. The bones of these H & J kits are excellent. They make a fantastic canvas to build your detail skills or show those skills to full effect.

However, if you start looking at references or had the pleasure of climbing around on an actual Pz IV or both then these two kits might prove extremely disappointing :disappointed:.

*Qualified Panzer Police have a substantial list of missed weld seams on the hull, the turret, issue with welds & lettering missed on wheels, lack of casting numbers on bogies, missing nuts, bolts, recessed screws on turret top, hull top, engine deck omitted details, missing wing nuts (both full and half) etc.

*Beating on kits with hair splitting has limited appeal to me and ruins my enjoyment of the kit, the build so with point made, time to stop.

4 Fit It fits pretty well but there’s definitely a :violin: fiddle :violin: factor for skirt rail alignment, turret skirts and suspension bogies.

3 Doesn’t Require Aftermarket With time a lot can be done without aftermarket parts. Kit tracks with a hint of sag via super glue etc. Realistically due time & fiddle factors etc aftermarket maybe more desirable.

4 Details Built Out of the Box

Back in the day, when new properly built out of the box an H or J was an outstanding contest model for IPMS shows due Tamiya design quality. My only stock build to win a local IPMS contest, Best of Show was a Tamiya Pz IV H nearly 30 years ago

1st H build from 1997

37 out of 50

37/50 => 74%

Recommended as:
canvas to practice or show detailing skills, campaign build,
nostalgia build.

Otherwise not recommended at all the H& J have both been surpassed. It’s the wrong kit for aspiring would be Mr. Wolfgang von Panzer Meister, aficionado extraordinaire

Bonus Folklore, Trivia & Irrelevant Information

The Pz IV J that started my adventure in serious model building back in 1994…

…completed in 2024

In 1994, #35181 was a brand new release. I was happy with the kit until checking Achtung Panzer IV #3 and other references. One of my good friends said this J build was a colossal waste of time that would have been better spent on a worthwhile Dragon Pz IV. Objectively, I think it’s hard to argue against his point of view. With a little TLC these older kits will build up close to the newer kits without much difficulty.

I built the much newer Dragon Pz IV F1 a while back. Excluding tracks it took ~56 hours - basically out of the box. I found the kit to be nice when assembled but an unpleasant build experience. There are about a dozen Dragon Pz IV kits sitting in the closet. It’s hard to really get motivated and tackle another Dragon Pz IV kit but I wouldn’t hesitate to build yet another Tamiya Pz IV H or J kit…so there is that factor in the Tamiya kits favor despite the need for adding details :wink:

6 Likes

I’ve always been curious about the Tamiya Zimmerit decals. How was your experience with these? Easy to use? Will they peel off after a few years? Etc.

Damon.

2 Likes

Damon,

I found the Tamiya Zimmerit decals far more tedious and time intensive compared to make-your-own-zimmerit-with-tamiya-gray-putty-testors-liquid-cement. Cutting the zimmerit stickers out really wasn’t my cut of tea. I had to use a metal straight edge and keep a fresh new blade available to cut and trim. Precision cutting with a knife blade is one of my weakness as model builders so the stickers were difficult to use.

A few edges required a touch of CA to lock down. Several corners required liquid cement thinned putty to be used to fill the sticker edges.

The adhesive has held up well. They decals were applied in 2021 and all of them are still secured. When drybrushing I lifted a few edges and had to reseal them to the model with CA.

To my eye, the Tamiya zimmerit decals look better than Italeri’s crappy molded zimmerit and better than Eduard beyond crappy PE zimmerit. Most other options look better than the Tamiya stickers too.

On the plus side Tamiya provides plenty of stickers material with pattern options for turret face etch.

From distance overall the Tamiya zimmerit stickers are OK…

…I am very unlikely to use them again.

7 Likes