Destruction is OK, it’s part of what this type of vehicle is designed for and what often happens to them, but the images need to provide some information.
Those FPV images are very near the limit of being useless for modelling.
They do show the close coupling of two recovery vehicles, in the first post the leading BREM seems to be on fire already.
The tank trying to climb onto another shows top side details even if a lot of it is obscured by flames.
Really 
Very much my point, so thank you for pointing it out.
Ironically, both images showed the imminent destruction of Russian equipment and personnel, so to be called a ‘troll’ for pointing that out was amusing to say the least.
Well, my comment was deleted completely, at least you are still in it.
Maybe this will get deleted too.
Ken
FPV images aren’t what I’d call useless for modelling given that they can be used for diorama per example.
It very much depends upon their quality, like all media.
When someobody is trolling pictures, it is rather obvious.
Aha!
Soft armour!
No, it’s not the same thank first two and third pic.
On first two pictures it is interesting to see top of the cage and reactive armour. Third picture is nice idea for diorama.
No, the first two are a T 80BVM and the last is a T 72B3, the armour Lay-out are completely different
Ah, this is how my BBQ grill works.
Your BBQ grill is a T-80 tank?
Ken
